Dinamika Sosial dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Manajemen Pendidikan Islam: Studi Kasus di Ponpes Miftahul Falah Cantigi

Miftah Nurul  Ma'arif; Desi Sri  Sulistia; Cahyadi Cahyadi

Authors

Miftah Nurul Ma'arif STITNU Al-Farabi Pangandaran
Desi Sri Sulistia STITNU Al-Farabi Pangandaran
Cahyadi Cahyadi STITNU Al-Farabi Pangandaran

Keywords:

Social Dynamics, Decision Making, Islamic Education Management

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the social dynamics in the decision-making process at Ponpes Miftahul Falah Cantigi. Descriptive qualitative data collection methods are used, and data collection is carried out through documentation, interviews, and observations. In addition, this study uses various references from various articles, journals, and other websites. Data shows that the decision-making process at Miftahul Falah Islamic Boarding School always prioritizes Islamic values ??and teachings, and involves active participation from all stakeholders. Participatory approaches, open communication, and awareness of diversity are also considered, of course, in order to create better decisions and support the desired educational goals. And allows educational institutions to be more inclusive, transparent, and responsive to the needs of society and the demands of the times.

References

Afrizal. (2016). Meode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ainiyah, N. (2013). Melalui Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Al-Ulum, 13(1), 25–38.

Anisa Febriyanti. (2015). Lingkungan Eksternal dan Internal Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Kependidikan, III(2), 1–13.

Fauzan Ahmad Siregar, & Lailatul Usriyah. (2021). Peranan Komunikasi Organisasi dalam Manajemen Konflik. Idarah (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kependidikan), 5(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.47766/idarah.v5i2.147

Fuadah, L., & Kolis, N. (2023). Gaya Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Lembaga Pendidikan Islam: Studi Atas Perilaku Pengelola Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Excelencia: Journal of Islamic Education & Management, 3(01), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.21154/excelencia.v3i01.1480

Hajiannor. (2015). Ijtihad dan Peranannya dalam Pendidikan Islam. Ta’lim Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam, 6 No 02.

Hayati, I., Khofifah, N., & Amin, A. (2023). Efektivitas Tahapan Proses Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Program Inovasi Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di SMA N 10 Kota Bengkulu. Journal on Education, 5(4), 15840–15851.

Ismunandar, A. (2019). Dinamika Sosial dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Transformasi Sosial Masyarakat. Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 03(2), 205–219. http://doi.org/10.32332/tarbawiyah.v3i2.1810

Khafidz Fuad Raya, M. (2016). Resolusi Konflik dalam Institusi Pendidikan Islam (Kajian Empirik dan Potensi Riset Resolusi Konflik). Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 1(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.35316/jpii.v1i1.38

Khaliq, A. (2019). Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Pustaka Ilmu, 1(January), 92–105.

Rochman, I. (2019). SWOT Analysis in Educational Institutions (Case Study at Yogyakarta Islamic Middle School). Al Iman: Journal of Islam and Society, 3(1), 36–52. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/madura/index.php/aliman/article/view/3527

Sabri, A. (2013). Kebijakan Dan Pengambilan Keputusan Dalam Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 20(2), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v20i2.34

Saihu, S. (2020). Pendidikan Islam Di Era Pluralitas Agama Dan Budaya: Sebuah Kajian Resolusi Konflik Melalui Model Pendidikan Plrualisme. Andragogi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.36671/andragogi.v2i2.107

Sholeh, M. ibnu sholeh. (2023). Relevansi Dan Tantangan Implementasi Hukum Islam Dalam Konteks Sosial Masyarakat Modern. As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, 12(1), 21–57. https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v12i1.484

Willett, M. S., Andrew, D. P. S., & Rudisill, M. E. (2016). Understanding Budget Models in Higher Education and their Applications to Kinesiology: Strategies for Success. Kinesiology Review, 5(4), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2016-0019